Summary:
How accurate are current estimation methods for fugitive methane emissions in methane-producing facilities, and how do they vary across biogas plants, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), and landfills? Based on this, the hypothesis posited in this study is that current methods significantly underestimate methane emissions, particularly in WWTPs and biogas plants, due to limitations in accounting for recovered methane and the reliance on general parameters such as the oxidation factor. To test this, a comparative analysis was carried out involving 33 biogas plants, 87 WWTPs, and 119 landfills in the Iberian Peninsula, comparing officially recorded data with estimates derived from our own calculations. Our findings confirm the lack of precision in current emission estimation methods, particularly for WWTPs and biogas plants, where factors like the omission of recovered methane lead to underreporting. This study highlights that WWTPs emit the largest amount of methane due to their organic material processing, exceeding emissions from landfills and biogas plants. In contrast, methods for estimating emissions in landfills are found to be more reliable. The results suggest that improving calculation methodologies, especially for WWTPs and biogas plants, as well as enhancing leak monitoring and methane recovery systems, is crucial to reducing the environmental impact of methane-producing facilities.
Keywords: fuel production; methane emissions; biogas plants; wastewater treatment plants; landfills; methane recovery; greenhouse gases
JCR Impact Factor and WoS quartile: 2,700 - Q3 (2023)
DOI reference:
https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels5040042
Published on paper: December 2024.
Published on-line: November 2024.
Citation:
D. Gil-García, M. Revuelta-Aramburu, C. Morales-Polo, M.M. Cledera-Castro, Optimizing Methane Recovery for Fuels: A Comparative Study of Fugitive Emissions in Biogas Plants, WWTPs, and Landfills. Fuels. Vol. 5, nº. 4, pp. 762 - 781, December 2024. [Online: November 2024]
Download this paper